Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Re: comparison: Olympus 100/2.8 and Tamron 90/2.5

Subject: Re: [OM] Re: comparison: Olympus 100/2.8 and Tamron 90/2.5
From: "Wayne Culberson" <waynecul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 07:49:47 -0400

> Well, yeah, if a set of tubes is $30.  A few weeks ago when I was working
> through my options at a camera show, a vendor showed me a set of 3 used
> Olympus tubes: $150.  No glass mind you.  $150 for 3 logos, 3 stainless
> steel body mounts and 3 stainless steel lens mounts with some space in
> between.  :)  They were reassuringly solid and heavy but I passed.
> Different stokes for different folks.  No slam intended.  (You probably
knew
> that.)  Besides, for the same $150, I was a.) able to SELL the 100 making
> the macro ability essentially free, b.) have something built for the
> purpose, c.) sharper than the Zuiko 100/2.8, and d.) has a tripod mount on
> the life-size adapter.  <shrug>

I have a set of vivitar tubes, which are still like new, and will likely
stay that way as long as I own them. For me, they are not very practical to
use. I like my Zuiko 100/2.8, but its not made for macro. About the only
practical option for a real macro lens is the vivitiar 2x macro converter.
imho
Wayne


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz