Here's one of mine with the 300/4.5 Zuiko + 1.4. Your pot shot hit the
bulls eye I'd say.
http://www.whitneygallery.com/html/moon_court.html
George
>
>
> Doesn't look like a photograph to me at all. Looks like elements of photos
> are here, but the 'sky' color has no gradation, which I'm accustomed to
> seeing in any sky, from dawn to dusk. The 'water' looks unnatural in the
> view that includes a pure black sillohuette. I think the question of focal
> length is moot on this one... Just what is the focal length of photoshop?
> ;-)
>
> I'm sure our astrophotographers could tell us what focal length
> would render
> the moon to film in that proportion to a full frame. I'll take a pot shot
> and say 400.
>
> Mickey
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Hudson" <13874@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "LIST - Olympus" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 6:17 PM
> Subject: [OM] Galen Rowell and the moon
>
>
> > Tonight there is a brilliant full moon over south eastern New Brunswick.
> > Driving home on the Trans Canada Highway the moon rose over the north
> > eastern horizon at about 5pm and the view reminded me of the image by
> Galen
> > Rowell found in the bottom right hand corner of this page:.
> >
> > http://www.mountainlight.com/stockdept/stockportfolio.html
> >
> > I an curious about the focal length of the lens Rowell used for
> this shot
> > and wonder if anyone might like to offer an opinion.
> >
> > John Hudson
> >
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
> >
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|