Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Beattie Intenscreen vs. OM 2-X screen

Subject: Re: [OM] Beattie Intenscreen vs. OM 2-X screen
From: "John Hermanson" <omtech@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 14:30:07 -0500
Well, um, NO.  Kodak didn't invent it, I read about it in one of their "How
To" guides.  Sorry if I gave you that impression. I think it was
Michaelangelo or somebody from that period.  Since dad worked for Kodak we
had just about every book they ever published along with all the free film,
processing, b&w paper, and darkroom chemicals a family of 5 could ever use.
_________________________________
John Hermanson  www.zuiko.com
Camtech, Olympus Sales & Service since 1977
21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743-4714
631-424-2121 For Free Olympus manuals,
please call 1-800-221-3000
_________________________________
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tris Schuler" <tristanjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Beattie Intenscreen vs. OM 2-X screen


> Woody, the grid's simple enough: four lines divide the focus screen into
> six equal parts (imagine a tic-tac-toe arrangement), with the line
> intersections handy for rule-of-thirds composition. These lines are
> discreet and by tale thinner than those provided by Beattie off the shelf.
>
> By the way, John mentioned to me (when I first made inquiry re his
etching)
> that Kodak (I believe he said) "invented" the rule of thirds--back in the
> 50s or 60s? I was moved to observe that this theory of composition was
> hardly new or in need of recent (re)invention for, as far as I know, it
> dates back to at least the time of Rembrandt, indeed, if not as far back
as
> Leonardo da Vinci!
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz