My friend, you are in "denial," and hopelessly a zuiko lover. Me too.....and
happy with it. ha ha.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Keeping "unused" lens
> I agree with Tom about the 35-80/2.8. Mine often stays at home,
> too. If I'm toting, I leave it in favor of the 35-105/3.5~4.5,
> and if I'm hauling, I leave it in favor of the 28-105/2.8 Tamron.
>
> But despite an occasional threat to do so, I probably won't sell
> mine. I've bought and sold and traded a fair amount of camera
> gear over the years, but I have never, ever parted with a Zuiko.
>
> Some might think I'm a Zuikoholic, but that's simply not true. I
> could get rid of all of them if I really wanted to. I just don't
> want to, so that means it's a rational decision, not an illness,
> that prevents me from parting with even one precious.
>
> Walt
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 06:23:30 -0500
>
> >Perhaps the most painful is the 35-80/2.8. No question it is an
> >amazing lens -- truly world-class. I still find myself leaving
> >it behind in favor of the 35-70/3.5-4.5. The biggest reason is
> >size and weight. The 35-80 is big and heavy, compared to the
> >little 35-70. Are the images 'better'? Probably, but not enough
> >to my untrained eye to carry it. I am seriously considering
> >selling it, as it is hard to justify having that much money tied
> >up.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|