Hmm... I don't doubt what I see; what I doubt is the comparison is
true.. Film is analog, and to convert it to digital, and then talk
about how it "loses" is not that great of a comparison..
You have "conversion loss" on the film side that you don't on the
digital side. The final media is my computer screen, and so the digital
side has a 1 tier advantage already. The film is scanned in, which
means a "lossy" event has occurred... It is not a fair comparison.
It would be like trying to wet-print a digital image, by first
converting it to film, and then making a wet-print. It's not a fair
comparison...
Albert
I don't know Albert. The images are on the page. Isn't your statement
a little like the joke about an engineer saying a bumblebee can't fly
because it is aerodynamically impossible.
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California, USA
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|