I'm a bit worry if what you said low chroma is like that:
http://www.olympus.co.jp/LineUp/Digicamera/C2100uz/c2100uzsp_03.html
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "William Clark" <wclark@xxxxxxx>
> I am serious. If you read my original post, the only digital camera that
I
> found (P&S version) that was acceptable (i.e., minimal shutter lag, low
> chromatic aberration, fit in hand, good build) was the Olympus 2100UZ. I
> used that for a number of years until I got my Fuji S2. There is a huge
> difference. The S2 beats film in many ways, the P&Sers do not.
>
> I am not an incompetent user. With my S2, I do not have to worry about
> shake, lag time, etc. Just like my Om1n. I will not shoot on a digcam
> where I have to think about its operation maybe screwing up a shot, which
is
> why I have waited to get a DSLR.
>
> I have many friends who have P7S digcams who have had a ton of problems
with
> them (blurry, poor colour etc). You know what, I lend them my S2 and with
> no instruction they take better pictures.
>
> There is a difference, a big one and until you shoot with a DSLR you
cannot
> know.
>
> -Bill
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|