Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Portrait work: Reala or NPS 160??

Subject: Re: [OM] Portrait work: Reala or NPS 160??
From: Joel Wilcox <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 07:52:21 -0600
At 07:10 AM 2/9/2003 -0500, John you wrote:
Albert,
For traditional [formal] portraiture, Kodak Portra NC or Fuji NPS is the failsafe stuff to use. Reala is really good stuff, but it's more general purpose with higher saturation and slightly higher contrast.

As always, exactly what you choose to use depends on what you want for results; it's a tradeoff. Go with the Reala *if* there is strong reason for higher saturation and a little more contrast. Go with the pro portrait films (e.g., Portra or NPS) if finer tonal gradation and accuracy with the skin tones are more important than higher saturation and contrast.

I am starting to like Portra 160NC for general photography. It's like Kodachrome in a print film. The grain at ASA 160 seems better than most ASA 100 print films. Anyone else have this experience?

Joel W.


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz