Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] [OT] No more big SUV (fuel and air mass-flow meters)

Subject: RE: [OM] [OT] No more big SUV (fuel and air mass-flow meters)
From: Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 16:45:19 -0500
At 8:20 PM +0000 2/8/03, olympus-digest wrote:
>Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 11:33:16 -0800
>From: siddiq <iddibhai@xxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: RE: [OM] [OT] No more big SUV (fuel and air mass-flow meters)
>
>2/8/2003 11:16:40 AM, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >OM Content:  My Volvo-brand camera transporter likes single-digit OMs best, 
> >and measures airfolw with a hot-wire anometer.  The wire 
>is made of platinium.  Don't know how the fuel flow is measured.
> >
> >Joe Gwinn
>
>i'd think by measuring injector pulse length, as mentioned before. somehow i 
>doubt an inline-flow measuring device can be accurate 
>enough, easier to measure to how long injectors are open since they put out a 
>set volume multiply by length pulsed.

Sounds plausible, although one would also need to compensate for variations in 
fuel viscosity with temperature, a matter of table look-up.

I too have a dynamic miles-per-gallon (MPG) dashboard meter, and its answers 
are always plausible, and the dashboard long-term MPG dashboard agrees with 
manual computations from gas-purchase receipts, so the car must have an 
accurate method of measurement.

Joe Gwinn


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz