Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Not a need for speed?

Subject: Re: [OM] Not a need for speed?
From: Thomas Heide Clausen <T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 01:09:23 +0100
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 00:19:53 +0100
Thomas Heide Clausen <T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:54:25 -0600
> "Bill Pearce" <bspearce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > "But.....I also seem to find myself using slower and slower films
> > in general. "
> > 
> > Interesting point. I find myself gravitating to both ends of the
> > scale. In color, I rarely use the 400 speed, and never, never the
> > 200. If 100 won't do, it's on to 800 or 1600. Just got some
> > Konica Impressa 50, to check out it's special qualities.
> > 
> > In B&W, it's either dip into my stock of APX25, which I hoard
> > like Scrooge, or Plus X, or on to Fuji 1600 or Ilford 3200,
> > although I plan to try a return to tri x this summer, just for
> > the experience. Never have gotten a taste for Ilford 50.
> 
> Uhh...I have 5 3200 ASA in the freezer. I bought them years ago,
> thinking that at some point in time I would probably need them.
> They're still there, still unused. I was hooked on the Ilford PanF
> (50 ASA) for a while - nice film but too grany (*gg*)

And "grany" should really read "grainy".....sorry....

--thomas

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz