Hi Jon,
Here is another review of the 2450:
http://www.normankoren.com/Tutorials/Epson_flatbeds.html
If I don't remember wrong, it says that it is a good scanner, but a dedicated
35mm film scanner is better. On the other hand, you can scan MF and LF film
on the epson as well. Or a full 35mm film strip.
I have the Nikon LS-40. Nice scanner, but do get a hush house for it. :)
[Actually this URL probably stems from an old OM post. A good friend and list
member used to send me stuff (technical, relevant OT) from this list before
I joined.. :)]
Cheers,
Klaus
"Jon Mitchell" <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Which brings me to my next point. I've read a couple of good reviews of the
> Epson Perfection 2400 Photo, and wondered if anyone here had any thoughts on
> it. I know, I should probably go for a dedicated Film Scanner, but I could
> really do with something that does both (the Epson has a supposedly rather
> good film adaptor system thingy !).
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|