I've got the 21/3.5. Would think about replacing it with the 2. Hard sell
though, I love that little lens.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Scales [mailto:tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:29 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] OT hypothetical (?) question.
Let's owned both, multiple times.
Still own, 21/2
Don't own 180/2.8
But.
You have to consider what you like to photograph. I like landscapes. I
rarely do telephoto and when I do, the 200/4 is usually OK. Or, more
likely, a zoom.
For about the same money as the 21/2, or just a little more, consider a
Tamron 80-200/2.8 + 21/3.5.
Then you have everything.
Tom
> Which would you buy. Comparable money. User 21/2 (would be KEH bargain),
> or near new 180/2.8.
>
> And please, don't be a smart you know what and say 'both'.
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|