Yeah, Walt, if the money's the same why work? Spend some quality time with
your Zuiko's and Tamron's, communing with the goodness of it all... <g>
However, in my case I'd very much like to be working, because the money is
-definitely not- the same... unemployment, to put it delicately, sucks!
--
Jim Brokaw
OM-'s of all sorts, and no OM-oney...
on 2/11/03 9:56 AM, Timpe, Jim at Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Pull the plug, Walt. Wish I were that 'close'....
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Walt Wayman [mailto:hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:55 AM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [OM] 17mm
>
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
>
>> Let me add that one of my favorite, most-used lenses is the 21/2
>> Zuiko (see my landscape TOPE), and the 17/3.5 Tamron is not quite
>> up to that standard. But it's not that that far off, either, and
>> if you consider the dollar difference, it's one helluva bargain.
>>
>
> Correction: TOPE 10, water, not landscapes, which was TOPE 9.
>
> I'm a bit distracted today. This week is when I make the decision
> of whether or not to officially pull the plug and retire. The
> money is not much different either way, and think of how much free
> time I'll have to take pictures and clog up the list with off-
> topic BS. :-)
>
> Walt
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|