In a message dated 3/2/2003 3:50:56 PM Pacific Standard Time,
wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> >.... BUT while the lens may be smaller compared to the equivalent SLR
> >lens, one of the main selling point of the OM system to *me* is the
> >small size. While I have only held the E-20 for a few minutes, my
> >recollection is that the body is pretty large, comparable to most
> >wonderbricks.
> >
> >Ah well....
> >
> >// richard
The filter size of the new Olympus 300/2.8 is 112mm so it is the same size as
the Tamron and Tokina 300/2.8's and appears to have the same body size. I
don't see any size saving at all.
I was hoping for something smaller. Hope it is light though!
John
|