Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] Tamron 80-200/2.8 versions

Subject: RE: [OM] Tamron 80-200/2.8 versions
From: "Bob Fenstermacher" <bobfenstermacher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 22:37:59 -0800
Hi Moose and Wayne etal...

You guys are funny, Ha, Ha. :>D  Glad to see I got a couple of laughs, a
little humor goes a long way these dark days.

I may be mistaken-a strong possibility...heck, I didn't even know that the
lens existed until recently...

Give a realative newbie a break, are there two versions of this thing or am
I mistaken?

I've been using a Vivitar S1 70-210 and wondering why my shots are soft for
all this time, so any  improvement will be an improvement.

Now that I look kind of stupid, does anyone want to part with this obviously
heavy, large, ungainly, unsharp lens...??

Bob

-
>But, but, I didn't know there were 2 versions. I spent a lot of time
>looking at them on the 'Bay and never noticed different versions. I
>bought one and sent it back because it didn't have tripod mount or hood.
>I bought another one, just the same, but with the goodies. And I never
>knew I was falling in a trap. Where do these mysterious, obviously
>superior (bigger is always better, right?), 83mm versoins hide out?
>Help! Help!

>Moose

>Wayne Harridge wrote:

>>Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>Omygod! Are there 2 versions of this lens? Is my 77mm filter size
>>version no good? Oh me, oh my, what to do, what to do............
>>
>
>Isn't it obvious ?  You need both versions.
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz