Thanks Roger, I'll look into that, John.
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 21:38:43 +0200 "Roger D. Key" <rdk@xxxxxxxxxx>
writes:
>
> Regarding the macro lens, does it have to go to 1:1 or just 1:2 ? A
> Vivitar
> Close-Focussing 135mm f2.8 (see Cult Classics site) goes to 1:2, and
> is
> usually very reasonable in price. I have a couple, and am pretty
> satisfied
> with them.
>
> Roger Key
>
>
>
> John Gaasland wrote:
>
> I'm taking a five day intensive nature photograpy class in the
> Olympics
> in July. The instructors require one long telephoto lens, either a
> 300mm,
> 400mm, 500mm, or longer, with a matchin 1.4x. Just wondering what
> people
> on the list are using. I'm considering a Tamron 300/2.8 with a 1.4x
> and
> 2x. I don't want to break the bank.
>
> The other lens I will need is a macro. The instructors have
> specified a
> 100mm to 200mm. I've thought about getting a Tamron 90/2.5 in either
> the
> 49mm or 55mm versions. Any thought about these and other macro
> lenses
> would be appreciated too! I have searched the archives and found
> some
> info, but would like some fresh input. Thanks!
>
>
> John Gaasland, Olympia, WA.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________
Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|