On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 12:10:01 -0800
"R. Jackson" <jackson.robert.r@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yeah, no kidding. Thanks Moose. FWIW, my 50mm f1.8 is an MC
> version, serial #2885413. It has never exactly knocked me out, but
> it's not a bad lens at all, either. I was mainly just wondering if
> the difference between a 1.8 and a 1.2 was worth pursuing for
> limited-light shooting, but Moose has this exchange down to a
> dissertation. ;-)
>
So we have to address him dr. of zuihohology now? dr. Moose doesn't
seem bad, does it? :)
Anyways, did you decide to go for the 1.2?
--thomas
> -Rob
>
> On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 11:59 AM, Piers Hemy wrote:
>
> > Moose
> >
> > Thank you for an outstandingly helpful distillation of datat and
> > translation
> > of information into wise counsel (not that it is out of
> > character) in a form
> > which I haven't seen before. Bravo.
> >
> > Piers
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
--
-------------------------------------------
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~voop
-------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|