Unknown commentator: Considering the long running subject of this
thread, Perhaps we should call him Standard Lens Moose, PhZ
Moose: Would I then be nicknamed Stan or Phizz?
Standard Phizz - getting those SLM monograms ordered - Moose
PS: Yes, I know it should be ZuD, but I'd rather be a Phizz than a Zud ;-)
PPS: Anybody who makes the prostate joke out of that last line is banned.
PPPS: Still, a Zud is better than being an OlD (Dr of Olympusology)
Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 12:10:01 -0800
"R. Jackson" <jackson.robert.r@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yeah, no kidding. Thanks Moose. FWIW, my 50mm f1.8 is an MC
version, serial #2885413. It has never exactly knocked me out, but
it's not a bad lens at all, either. I was mainly just wondering if
the difference between a 1.8 and a 1.2 was worth pursuing for
limited-light shooting, but Moose has this exchange down to a
dissertation. ;-)
So we have to address him dr. of zuihohology now? dr. Moose doesn't seem bad,
does it? :)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|