Thanks, Joel.
Yeah, I did it exactly "by the numbers." But you're right about
the mailers, especially the older dark blue ones, which this one
was. I have some newer ones that I got directly from A&I instead
of from B&H, and they are much better: white with the "to" address
printed in big, bold, black letters.
But I'm seriously considering going with local processing
henceforth, even if it is a bit less convenient and possibly more
expensive.
Walt
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Joel Wilcox <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 23:39:54 -0600
>Jim,
>You misunderstand. Doing it by the numbers is what got Walt in
>trouble.
>
>The A&I mailers are lame IMO. The logistics are exactly the same
>as a Kodak mailer. It's just that the mailing address side
>doesn't really look very much like a mailing address. Not very
>business-like. When I first saw one I thought, "That looks kind
>of cool, but will the PO know what to do with it?" Now I know.
>
>I am going to benefit from Walt's experience and create proper
>address labels to paste on the "To:" side of my remaining A&I
>mailers.
>
>Joel W.
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|