Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 35-80mm f2.8 BIN $875

Subject: Re: [OM] 35-80mm f2.8 BIN $875
From: Skip Williams <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 21:00:26 -0500
Moose,

How do you like the Tokina?  I sold my Zuiko 28-48, as It didn't have enough 
range on the low end.

How much did you pay?

Skip


----------------------------------------
Please reply to skipwilliams at pobox.com
I might not notice personal emails to this address
----------------------------------------

>
>Subject: Re: [OM] 35-80mm f2.8 BIN $875
>   From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>   Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 17:45:55 -0800
>     To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>I'm not compulsive or anything, I just happen to have a spreadsheet with 
>some specs on some zooms of interest to me.
>
>The specs on the Zuiko are from eSIF. Tamron 28-105 from B&H and may not 
>include the 9-10mm of an adaptall mount. Tamron 35-105 specs are 
>measured from my lens including mount. As you can see, the Tamron 35-105 
>is the same length and weight as the Zuiko and just a little fatter, 
>accomplishing all the breeding you ask for except for the wide end. The 
>67mm filter size is actually no disadvantage over the 62mm of the Zuiko 
>for me as it is the same as Tokina AT-X 35-200/3.5-4.5 (and the 
>equivalent Tamron SP). I use a 62-67mm ring to use the 67mm filters on 
>the Tamron SP 60-300/3.8-5.6, so either size is much the same for me.
>
>I've been using the 28/2 to augment the wide end and recently picked up 
>a Tokina AT-X 24-40/2.8 to try out as a complement.
>None of these lenses focus close enough for me.
>
>                Zuiko    Tamron SP    Tamron SP
>                 f2.8       f2.8        f2.8
>                35-80      28-105      35-105
>Length Min       99        112          98
>      Max                              127
>Diameter         69         86          76
>Weight          650        875         650
>Filter size      62mm       82mm        67mm
> Close focus    0.6m       1.6         1.0m
> Max. Macro     1:8.6      1:4.7       1:7.3
>
>Walt Wayman wrote:
>
>>I blame having had only one cup of coffee.  I'm not awake enough to read 
>>well.  It's the 28-105/2.8 Tamron I've got.  How much smaller is the 
>>35-105/2.8?  Maybe adding those genes to the pool would be beneficial.
>>  
>>
>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz