ML Archiv: Re: [OM] A non-hazy 65-200, was hazy 65-200

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] A non-hazy 65-200, was hazy 65-200

from Daniel Mitchell

Subject:	Re: [OM] A non-hazy 65-200, was hazy 65-200
From:	"Daniel Mitchell" <danmitchell@xxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:35:57 -0600

clintonr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> OK, here's what you do: [snip] Reassemble and reset focus.  Easy!

 It all sounded so easy, until the 'reset focus' bit! How would I go about
doing that? That sounds like the sort of thing that could go very wrong if I
mess it up..

 thanks,

 -- dan


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] A non-hazy 65-200, was hazy 65-200, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] A non-hazy 65-200, was hazy 65-200, Daniel Mitchell Re: [OM] A non-hazy 65-200, was hazy 65-200, clintonr Re: [OM] A non-hazy 65-200, was hazy 65-200, Jim Brokaw Re: [OM] A non-hazy 65-200, was hazy 65-200, clintonr Re: [OM] A non-hazy 65-200, was hazy 65-200, Daniel Mitchell <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] This is the first time I have posted questions..., Per Ohstrom
Next by Date:	[OM] ZA Copenhagen meeting friday, Lars Haven
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] A non-hazy 65-200, was hazy 65-200, clintonr
Next by Thread:	[OM] The Seven Winders of the World, AG Schnozz
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]