Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM-3 versus OM-1, results of the Belgian jury.

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-3 versus OM-1, results of the Belgian jury.
From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 15:55:35 -0400
I don't use my OM-3 all that much.  I have become too accustomed 
to the convience of the OM-4 species, because with the 4s, when I 
change the aperture, the camera changes the shutter speed 
accordingly.  With the 3, I have to do two things in order to end 
up exactly the same place that I get to by doing only one thing 
with the 4.  Maybe I'm just lazy.

Walt

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: iwert <zuiko@xxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:  Thu, 01 May 2003 20:50:28 +0200

>Hello everybody,
>
>I have been using my newly acquired OM-3 for about two weeks now 
>and I did not miss my OM-1n yet. Spot metering makes a huge 
>difference, as well as the fact that the camera has the same form 
>factor and lay-out as the 4. Generally, I even like it more than 
>my OM-4Ti... It is a joy to use this fully mechanical camera with 
>its snorring shutter. Back to basics, but with a very nice light 
>meter. This camera makes me think about pictures and light and 
>composition and DOF. With the OM-4 I am too much tempted to put 
>it on auto and shoot aperture priority. So all in all I am very 
>happy with the OM-3 and I feel it makes my OM-1n obsolete.
>
 


 
                   

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz