Sharpening usually will NOT affect the bokeh, unless you do it
extremely too much but I never seen one. Below is a closer example of
better bokeh lens (Zuiko 75-150), I mean lens character not necessary
good choose of background as this one is not good at all:
http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/dc/IMG_1283.jpg
A poor bokeh lens will make the background details look like seeing
through an astigmatic eye, I have shown some examples of good bokeh
lens (35-70/3.6) and bad one (Zuiko 50/1.2) before. Now with the Canon
10D I can make a fast comparison of all Zuiko I have, I will do it for
the 50mm lens first (but unfortunately I have sold the 50/1.2), stay
tuned.
C.H.Ling
"Gary L. Edwards" wrote:
>
> Some.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Skip Williams
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 9:42 PM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah?
>
> The flower is nice, but the background bokeh is pretty jarring. Was it
> sharpened?
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System. For more information on a proactive email security
service working around the clock, around the globe, visit
http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
