Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah?

Subject: Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah?
From: Skip Williams <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 09:29:55 -0500
On this I respectfully disagree.  But that's just my opinion.


-----------------------------------------------------------------
Please reply to [skipwilliams at pobox.com]
Direct responses to the email address on the header may get lost
----------------------------------------------------------------->
>Subject: Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah?
>   From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>   Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 09:40:00 +0800
>     To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>Yes it is nice but you cannot use it to judge the lens has good bokeh
>or not, because the out of focus is much more then the shot Gary
>shown. In your case I guarantee all lenses can produce this kind of
>bokeh.
>
>C.H.Ling
>
>Skip Williams wrote:
>> 
>> The flower is nice, but the background bokeh is pretty jarring.  Was it 
>> sharpened?
>> 
>> To my eyes, this is good bokeh: 
>> http://www.skipwilliams.adahost.com/data/grass-tamron-80-200-600fram.jpg
>> 
>> Skip
>> 
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz