Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Does buying a medium format make sense anymore? OT

Subject: Re: [OM] Does buying a medium format make sense anymore? OT
From: "R. Jackson" <jackson.robert.r@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 21:14:11 -0700
Andreas Gursky's work is on display at MOMA in SF right now. I'm not sure exactly what kind of digital equipment he used, but it had to be some kind of medium or large format rig. The photos are enormous and show an amazing amount of minute detail. I can't even guess what the resolution must have been. These huge crowd scenes from concerts where you can pick out tiny details about individual members of the audience and scenes at garbage dumps that pull you in to fragments of soda cans.

On Monday, May 19, 2003, at 09:10  PM, John A. Lind wrote:

IMO it will be some time before digital catches up to medium format in a manner that is affordable. If money is no object, there are already digital medium format backs. Requires the entire gross national product to buy one though. RF versus SLR versus TLR is a personal choice and involves how much you need to change lenses. The typical TLR (Mamiya being an exception) is a fixed lens camera. While most of the RF's may have interchangeable lenses, there are only a few. The SLR is most versatile with wide range of focal lengths offered for them. You should be able to get a basic, older medium format camera body and lens for under $500, possibly under $300, and still have a decent quality body and lens to show for it.

-- John


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz