> Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> I find I usually choose the 21/2 over the 18/3.5. At almost two stops
> faster, it is a lot more convenient in most lighting situations. I
> then attach an Olympus 0.8x to the front, to give me the equivalent
> angle of view of a 16.8mm f2 lens!
>
> The Oly 0.8x does not vignette with the 21/2, but the quality is not
> quite as good as the "naked" 18/3.5, but you can get the pair for
> cheaper than the 18/3.5, and it's almost two stops faster...
>
What is that combination like for linear distortion ?
I'm thinking architectural images.
Wayne Harridge
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~w_harridge
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|