Let's risk the off-topic police...
35/2.8 shift, at full shift (11.5mm in this case) each way, very nearly
covers (over the two frames) the angle of view of a 17/3.5 Tamron. My 24 is
away on a vacation at present, so I can't directly answer your original
question Peter, but I hope that will point you in the right direction.
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Piers Hemy
Sent: 04 June 2003 10:21
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [OM] Re: Shift Lenses
I would offer to test on my 35/2.8 shift, but it's not a Zuiko, so I suppose
that would be off-topic! (and it's not a shift, it's a T&S)
Piers
--snip
The way I understand this comparison of a 35mm shift to a 24mm is the
following: if you shift it all the way up and mark what you see, then shift
it all the way down and mark what you see, then the complete image covered
by those 2 marks will correspond to the image of a 24mm. Is that correct ?
--snip
Peter.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|