Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Om Voitlander

Subject: Re: [OM] Om Voitlander
From: "Mickey Trageser" <vze3m2s8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 23:17:47 -0400
Yes, I had earlier opined about an adaptall body with varous mount inserts
to accommodate any lens type. Seems too easy, too obvious. Won't happen...
Mickey
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lama-Jim L'Hommedieu" <lamadoo@xxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Om Voitlander


> Maybe Sigma will get tired of people skipping past their digital body
because of the Sigma-only mount.
>
> In my daydream, they invent an Adaptall-2-like non-mount receptacle.
Suddenly every Canon FD has a digital back.  Every F mount
> Nikkor, going all the way back, has a digital back.  Every manual focus
Rokkor has a digital back.  Oh, yeah, suddenly Tom's
> collection of Zuiko super-teles pays off.
>
> And the moon is always full.  And the Palestinians and Jews have a
peaceful border.  Irish Catholics and Irish Protestants celebrate
> Christmas together everyday.  And......
>
> Lama
> PS,
> How come I always have a migrane when I come home from the camera show?
>
>
> From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Certainly the OM2000 fits the general description. Perhaps the Bessaflex
> add some bells and whistles. In any case, I'm quite content with my OM
> film cameras and don't see much use in a new film Bessaflex-OM. What I
> want to know is where is the Bessaflex-OM Digital?
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz