| Subject: | Re: [OM] C*non 10D vs. Hassey 503CW |
|---|---|
| From: | Albert <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:45:27 +0800 |
It was a 10D, the reason being, that a used Hassey with a 80mm f2.8 is
going to cost you LESS than a 10D. So they wanted to do the comparison
at the price point also..
Albert < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] RE: Boris' adventures in digital domain, Moose |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [OM] C*non 10D vs. Hassey 503CW, Wayne Harridge |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] C*non 10D vs. Hassey 503CW, Richard F. Man |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] C*non 10D vs. Hassey 503CW, Wayne Harridge |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |