Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] C*non 10D vs. Hassey 503CW

Subject: Re: [OM] C*non 10D vs. Hassey 503CW
From: Stephen Troy <sctroy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:05:33 -0400
>From: "Richard F. Man" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [OM] C*non 10D vs. Hassey 503CW
>
>Is it really just the 10D and not the 1Ds? If so, it is unfair and stupid 
>comparison. Sure, the prices are almost somewhat within a factor, but the 
>folks who will move from a Hassey to digital will be looking at the 1Ds, 
>not the 10D.


I doubt it - they would probably be looking for a Kodak DCS or Phase One
back for their Hassy.

Ever price those things?  The price won't make anyone happy.

We just spend $26,000 on a Phase One back for an RZ67.  It's so sharp it
makes the 1Ds images look like they're out of focus on a side-by-side
comparison.

It's *almost* as good as film! (And I do mean *almost* - digital moire
patterns are a pain)

Steve Troy


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz