Never a problem for me when I had my OM-2 unless I laid a 2x4 on top of it when
it was already wound. I usually found a different
place to store lumber. :) I'm not arguing, I'm just saying.
I'd rather have a correctly exposed subject, even if she is one foot past the
limit of correct flash exposure (OM-2). The 2n takes
that away, and keeps you from making really long auto exposures of nightscapes.
Different strokes.
Lama
From: "Rich Doggett" <doggre@xxxxxxx>
> The OM-2
> however will keep the shutter open when the flash does not give enough
> output, using available light OTF as an addition to the light produced by
> the flash. Some people think this is an advantage, but it is not without
> reason Olympus changed this in the OM-2n: the electromagnetic shutter will
> quickly drain the battery when it stays open for extended periods.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|