At 12:00 AM 6/27/03, Dan wondered:
How do you know that?
Dan
Dan,
Compare the data sheets:
Kodak Royal Gold 400:
http://www.kodak.com/global/plugins/acrobat/en/consumer/products/techInfo/e7007/e7007.pdf
Kodak High Definition 400:
http://www.kodak.com/global/plugins/acrobat/en/consumer/products/techInfo/e7013/e7013.pdf
(long URL's . . . paste them back together if they wrap)
Identical description
Identical non-daylight color correction recommendations
Identical "proper exposure" density data
Identical print grain index
Identical characteristic curves (log exposure)
Identical spectral sensitivity curves
Identical spectral dye density curves
Take the Kodak Royal Gold 400 data sheet, change the name at the top,
delete the very short paragraph containing exposure time limits to avoid
reciprocity failure, and Bob's your uncle, it's a Kodak High Definition
data sheet!
If it looks like a duck, flies like a duck, walks like a duck, swims like a
duck, quacks like a duck and defecates like a duck, then it's a duck. :-)
-- John
At 11:36 AM 6/26/03, you wrote:
>Great info Saso!
>Has anybody tried Kodak's new High Definition 400?
>Dan
AFIK it's Kodak Royal Gold 400 with a new name.
-- John
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|