Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Which OM is best for astrophotography

Subject: Re: [OM] Which OM is best for astrophotography
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 14:20:34 -0700
OK, I 've had a question for some time for you astrophotogs. In exposures measuring from 10s of minutes to hours, what difference does mirror lock-up make? Mirror, aperture and shutter crash-bang all damp down in maybe a second or 2. So out of all the light that makes up even a 2 min. exposure, less than 1 0s disturbed. How can that affect the image? None of that light which is in the wrong place, and a moving wrong place at that, will even register on the film.

Moose

Chuck Norcutt wrote:

As others have said, what you want is an OM-1 which, in addition to its other desirable traits is fairly cheap. In addition to the interchangeable screens (a trait shared with all "single digit" OM bodies, ie; OM-1,2,3 and 4) the OM-1 offers mirror lock-up (minimizes vibration) and a mechanical shutter (prevents battery drain during long esposures).





< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz