Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM 35/70 vs 35 105

Subject: Re: [OM] OM 35/70 vs 35 105
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 17:21:30 +0100
John

Have a good holiday. I should take the shorter lens. It will be lighter, you are more likely to carry it, you can walk closer to your subject if necessary and it is slightly faster and sharper.

Chris
On Saturday, Jul 19, 2003, at 16:30 Europe/London, John Duggan wrote:

Going on hols tomorrow...my first choice 35/70mm lens is staying at
home...very unwell..needs a trip to the opticians  :-)
Do I replace it with my Olympus 35/70 f3.6....or 35/105? The 35/70 is 2
touch which I prefer, also front does not rotate so makes polariser
easier..also faster. The 35/105 is 1 touch and slower..front rotates But
has more  "reach". Which would you take?     Regards,
John Duggan, Wales, UK.
<|_:-)_|>

C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.

+44 (0)7092 251126
ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz