ML Archiv: Re: [OM] I'm back!

Subject:	Re: [OM] I'm back!
From:	Gregg Iverson <golftooter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 19 Jul 2003 13:20:22 -0400

You can't be conceited now, 'cause conceit is a fault.... and you have nofaults!


gregg

Andrew Fildes wrote:

Now, what do you want to argue about? :)



Nothing.

All my opinions are already correct.  ;-)


Garth


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Zuiko 300mm f4.5, (continued) Re: [OM] Zuiko 300mm f4.5, Thomas Heide Clausen Re: [OM] Zuiko 300mm f4.5, Andrew L Wendelborn [OM] oil on aperture blades, Andrew L Wendelborn Re: [OM] oil on aperture blades, Jim Brokaw [OM] I'm back!, andrew fildes Re: [OM] I'm back!, Moose Re: [OM] I'm back!, Garry D. Lewis Re: [OM] I'm back!, Chris Barker Re: [OM] I'm back!, andrew fildes Re: [OM] I'm back!, Garth Wood Re: [OM] I'm back!, Gregg Iverson <= Re: [OM] I'm back!, andrew fildes Re: [OM] I'm back!, Chris Barker Re: [OM] I'm back!, andrew fildes Re: [OM] I'm back!, Joel Wilcox Re: [OM] I'm back!, andrew fildes

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] OM 35/70 vs 35 105, Jeff Keller
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Plastic Lens question, OM4Ti
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] I'm back!, Garth Wood
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] I'm back!, andrew fildes
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]