Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Plastic Lens question

Subject: Re: [OM] Plastic Lens question
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 11:55:05 -0700
Before blaming the lens alone, put the camera on a tripod and check the results. Remember your gfs 'shakey hands'. Well, people do much worse things when taking pics when they don't know any better. Watch people with one-use and P&S cameras. Notice any who jerk the camera down when they push the release? I have, and have retrained some on how to minimize camera movement. How about those grab shots where the subject isn't moving, but the camera is? I had a sister-in-law who went all over Europe taking pictures with an instamatic. At it's best, the camera could only make mildly unfuzzy 3x5s, but the majority of her shots were so blurred that the subjects were unrecognizable. It's actually harder for most people to hold a small light camera steady. I'm not saying the lens is any good, just that the evidence presented is not sufficient to come to that conclusion that it isn't. I suspect AF is also a factor in some poorly focused pics with P&S cameras.

Moose

Albert wrote:

Sorry, slightly OT, but I was wondering, does anybody know the resolving limit on plastic lenses?

One of my students went on a trip and just got back; well, the pictures were horrible; taken with a P&S camera that had a plastic lens..

She said she was frustrated after seeing my pics as far as clarity and resolution. I'm just curious if anybody knows just how big of a difference glass vs. plastics is.




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz