Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 100mm 2 vs. 2.8

Subject: Re: [OM] 100mm 2 vs. 2.8
From: David Thatcher <davidt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 23:03:03 +0930
I probably should have indicated that I understand that my contest rules are
surely going to be in some way different to next guy's... 

...but not while TMBGitW is watching me type... 

<sound of rolling pin whistling thru the air...>

davidt

On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 06:07:56AM -0700, Timpe, Jim wrote:
> Where's the vasoline?
> BTW, congratulations.
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: David Thatcher 
> >Subject: Re: [OM] 100mm 2 vs. 2.8
> >
> >
> >
> >Olaf, 
> >
> >While at nearly 40 my wife is still The Most Beautiful Girl in 
> >the World, I get in big trouble if a photo of her doesn't have 
> >that 'romantic 50's Hollywood look'... <sound of david 
> >stuffing bits of mesh & fog filters back in his camera bag...>
> >
> >davidt
> >
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> 
> 


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz