Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] Get your umbrellas ready....

Subject: RE: [OM] Get your umbrellas ready....
From: "John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 00:29:24 -0500
At 11:49 PM 8/4/03, you wrote:
OK you did your cut and paste but what the hell is
magnitude of -2.9 and will appear 25.11 arc seconds wide?
Daniel

Magnitude is the brightness of a celestial object. It is based on star brightness. Counter-intuitive, the lower the magnitude number the brighter the object. The brightest stars are magnitude -1. It is 2.512 time brighter than a magnitude 0 star. Thus, a magnitude of -2.9 means it will be roughly six times brighter than the brightest star (-1 magnitude).

The "magnitude" system dates to Hipparcus and Ptolemy when they assigned magnitude numbers of 1 through 6 to the stars they could see with the unaided eye. They assigned first magnitude to a set of about 20 of the brightest stars they could see from their location. Sixth magnitude stars were just barely visible to the unaided eye under the most favorable conditions (very dark sky). Today the magnitude system assigns -1 to the brightest star(s).

An arc-second is an angular measure. There are 360 degrees to a circle, 60 minutes to a degree, and 60 seconds to a minute. To distinguish the use of minutes and seconds of angular measure from time measure, they are referred to as arc-seconds and arc-minutes. 25.11 arc-seconds is 0.006975 degrees. Angular measure is used to describe the diameter of a celestial object (typically planet or planetary moon) as viewed from Earth. That and its distance can be used to determine its absolute diameter using simple trigonometry. The utility of describing size by angular measure is in informing someone who wishes to observe the object how much magnification will be required (if any) to make it visible, and how much magnification will be required to make it appear a specific size. If only provided with absolute diameter (e.g. in miles), one would have to know its distance to calculate how big it will appear. It's much easier with direct information about how big it appears to an Earth observer without regard to distance. Furthermore, in very early astronomy it was much easier and more immediate to measure size through a calibrated telescope using a reticle in terms of angular measure (and still is). Measuring distance of an object requires several measures of object location against the most distant starfield over time as the Earth orbits the sun (e.g. one at the Vernal Equinox and another at the Autumnal).

-- John


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz