I looked to see if KEH put it back up for sale in the last 2 month but
never saw it come up again. I should call and see what they did with it.
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Skip Williams
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 3:33 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [OM] Tamron 180/2.5 2.5/180
Did they fix it?
Skip
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Please reply to [skipwilliams at pobox.com]
Direct responses to the email address on the header may get lost
----------------------------------------------------------------->
>Subject: RE: [OM] Tamron 180/2.5 2.5/180
> From: "Danrich" <danrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 02:28:56 -1000
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>I had a soft focus Tamron 180mm I sent back to KEH that did this.
>Dan
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Skip Williams
>Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:27 AM
>To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [OM] Tamron 180/2.5 2.5/180
>
>I've talked to three persons who have had their focus points go off,
>preventing them from focusing at infinity. Greg Logidice was the last
>person who had this problem, he's still on the list. Admittedly, this
>is a very small sample and has NO basis for representing the larger
>population....but it is strange.
>
>skip
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>Please reply to [skipwilliams at pobox.com]
>Direct responses to the email address on the header may get lost
>----------------------------------------------------------------->
>>Subject: Re: [OM] Tamron 180/2.5 2.5/180
>> From: Thomas Haegin <haegint@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:53:39 +0200 (CEST)
>> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>Skip
>>
>>> The Tamron 180/2.5, with it's ED glass, is similar.
>>> However, I've heard of at least three instances
>>> where the focusing has gone off on those lenses from
>>> different sources, which may be an aberration.
>>
>>You scare me! What do you mean by that, please? The
>>internal focus somehow not working correctly anymore
>>or what? Sorry if I misunderstand something here.
>>Really curious & thanks,
>>
>>Thomas
>>
>>__________________________________________________________________
>>
>>Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de
>>Logos und Klingeltöne fürs Handy bei http://sms.yahoo.de
>>
>>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|