Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Re: MC vs SC

Subject: Re: [OM] Re: MC vs SC
From: whunter <whunterjr@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 20:46:35 -0400
One must factor:
        - time period whence manufactured.
        - where manufactured and the vendor for MC
- evolutionary period for the 1.8 versus the 1.2 which is more than an order of magnitude when adjusted to include the number of units produced for each design X options for low cost bid for large production runs versus small / custom lots. FACT: "Inconsistency" in coating does NOT equate to inconsistency in optical performance.
Bill

On Friday, August 22, 2003, at 05:24  PM, Joe Gwinn wrote:

I believe that too, but what I see is perfect consistency in the 55/1.2 and complete inconsistency in the 50/1.8, and from economics alone one would expect more care and tighter tolerances in the more expensive lens.


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz