Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OT.. 6x7 or 6x9?

Subject: Re: [OM] OT.. 6x7 or 6x9?
From: "Jeff Keller" <jrk_om@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 10:34:14 -0700
Tom, your comments about the Nikon digital were appreciated by myself
and surely others ...

Maybe I ignored the people that jumped on you for it being OT, but I
didn't see that many. I'm guessing you got some off list email.

You could also say that all the mirror lens discussion is OT since
Olympus only makes a 500/8. I don't think the list will ever be strictly
Olympus. Even home made equipment such as C.H.'s macro diffuser are not
Olympus specific. Personally anything that gives me ideas about taking
pictures from OM knowledgeable people is on target (including your Nikon
digital). I hope you don't give up. I don't even see any digi pictures
on your scalesfamily.com/Tom. They all seem to be pretty old pictures
but maybe I looked in the wrong places.

Diet, religion, computer religion, politics, are the pointless OT IMO.

Best wishes, -jeff


----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


> Somebody needs to satisfy my curiosity.  OT discussions of MF cameras
are
> OK, but OT discussions of Nikon digitals are not OK.
>
> Honestly, since I'll never go MF, these discussions, which come up
every few
> weeks, bore the heck out of me.
>
> Aren't there any MF lists?
>
> Tom

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz