Sounds like you really want an 8x10! Then you could REALLY see the detail.
gregg
Albert wrote:
Richard, it's not my fault.. I blame it on those around me... (honestly!)
So I get my pictures back, and I think they are beautiful. So, next to
me, someone also got their pictures back...
While I made 4x6 prints, he didn't. 645 slides, easy to see with the
naked eye, details I can't capture..
Then someone walked between the two of us at the counter.. and got his
slides. "When you are doing with the light box, can I use it?" he asked,
holding 6x17 trannies in hand..
Now, normally, I'd chalk this up to the "need to be macho" problem.. But
it's not. I'm not a "comparison, need to be macho" type of guy, (if I
were, I'd buy a Canon white lens already ;-)
But I was just struck by how beautiful trannies from a medium format was,
and that is just something I can't get from 35mm. I look at trans from a
35mm, and I mean, the first thing you say is "where's that loupe???" With
645, or better yet, 6x7 or 6x9, no loupe needed. You just look, and are
breathless.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|