Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] an Albert intervention

Subject: Re: [OM] an Albert intervention
From: Albert <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 11:09:54 +0800
Absolutely.. But I can only imagine, if the images look that good (to me) on screen at 72dpi, the trannies in hand must make you faint..

And also, I've noticed my friend's pictures improve greatly since he went MF.. (He says it's zen, but I'm sure the slowing down, breathing, thinking, metering etc.. is probably what's doing it)

Crap on the web? More than you can scoop!! I've seen just absolutely horrible pics from almost every source (yours truly I'm sure included)

Of course, at the end of the day, I'm not fooling myself, the equipment is only one part of the equation, the photographer is the main reason for good pics..

Albert

Let's face it, there is a lot of absolute crap published on the web, and more of it seems to orginate from 35mm or digital than from MF or LF.

Please note, I may have generalised a little !

...Wayne


Wayne Harridge

http://members.optusnet.com.au/~w_harridge

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >





< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz