Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM 2' series screens brighter, or Beattie's?

Subject: Re: [OM] OM 2' series screens brighter, or Beattie's?
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 00:20:42 -0700
Equally bright. Maybe 2 stops? I don't remember and the eye compensates so there isn't much apparent brightness difference with normal lenses when it is bright out.

Oly must have the best microprism by default, since Beattie does not have any microprism screens, only plain and split image at 90 or 45 degrees.

The Beatties tend to darken with wide angle lenses where the Olys do not.

I like the 'finish' or grain or whatever, the look of the image, on the Olys better.

Beatties are fine screens. I like the 2 series Olys better. I have a plain Beattie and both a 2-4 and a 2-13 Oly.

The 1 series Olys with clear screens that focus only in the central microprism, the 1-5,6,7 & 12, are also brighter than those with matte finish. They are more specialized and not to everyone's taste.

Use of any of the above with an OM-1 requires either meter adjustment or setting a different film speed to compensate for the extra brightness or you pics will all be seriously underexposed.

Moose

Albert wrote:

I'm wondering, which focusing screen series are brighter (and perhaps with better microprism)?

The  2 series from Olympus, or the Beatties?

Also, how much brighter over the 1 series are the 2 series? 1 F-stop? 2-fstops? What about the Beatties?




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz