Oops, forgot the smiley :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian Davies" <julian_davies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] F280 for macro
> "Better than X sync" gives a clue that there may be a "Ti" in the answer.
>
> Julian
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Danrich" <danrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 9:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [OM] F280 for macro
>
>
> > Nice home work on the page because I have one myself I use on my OM4Ti.
> > You show no clue to what OM you where using?
> > XDan
> >
> >
> > Has anyone used the F280 for macro work? i have been playing around
> > with it
> > recently with good results, but have a question. it seems that the
> > light
> > seems more "natural" than with any of the X-Sync flashes. could this be
> > because the light has more time to bounce around with the longer flash
> > duration?
> >
> > anyway, i made a chart for a few of my lenses that has been working
> > well.
> > if curious, you can find it here:
> >
> >
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
> >
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|