Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 50/1.8 question

Subject: Re: [OM] 50/1.8 question
From: Roger Wesson <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 21:04:26 +0100
Do you feel like adding this information to the OM Wiki? There's a page there ready and waiting for information about the many variations of the 50/1.8:

http://ombook.world-traveller.org/index.php/Sidebar/Variations?action=edit

Cheers,
Roger

Moose wrote:

Further distinctions/info:

There are at least 2 variatoins within the SC F.Zuikos and the front ring went from silvernose to black while they were still SC F.Zuikos. The 'MC' marked lenses are better than the SCs, really good lenses optically, BUT, MANY of them suffer from slow/sticky diaphrams, so be careful with them. The last version, correctly described by Piers, 'miJ', not 'MIJ', goes back at least to serial number 3,500,000. I have had 4-5 in the 3.5-3.6 million range, only one has a slightly slow diaphram and construction, coatings look the same as over 5 million ser # samples.

Moose

Piers Hemy wrote:

Come on Bill, you need to be careful here, 'cos they all say that :-)

The earlier ones say "MADE IN JAPAN" on the lens flange.

The later (better) ones say "made in Japan" on the front ring.

As a further test:
If "F.ZUIKO" is on the front ring (or "G.ZUIKO" for a 50/1.4), it is an
early (not so good) lens
If "ZUIKO MC" is on the front ring, it is a middle aged (better) lens
If just "ZUIKO" is on the front ring, it is a more recent (best) lens



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz