Moose, You talk about "old model".
I have front pictures of the AT-X 80-200 2.8 with the serial number 82xxx,
83xxx, etc, but I have see too one lens with serial number 320xx.
Are there old and new versions of the AT-X 80-200 f 2.8 ?
What about the differences (stetic and performance) ?
Can somebody say something concerning the color rendition of theese lenses?
Almost all the lenses AT-X I have render warm-calid pictures. (Very
annoying for me).
Thanks.
Ángel Lobo.
Cuenca ( SPAIN ).
----- Original Message -----
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 5:20 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Tokina 80-200 f/2.8 value
> I watched a long time for one and eventually got a very nice one for
> $165, with mount, without hood and thought it was a good deal in May
> '02. The Oly mount ones show up so seldom, it's hard to nail down a
> value. I think I'd only seen 1 or 2 go by before I bought.
>
> I found that hoods are still available for old models, maybe tripod
> mounts are too. Kinda pricey on the hoods, but at least they got 'em:
>
> droberts@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> THK Photo Products
> D. L. Roberts
> Technical & Customer Services
> 800-421-1141 ect. 221
>
>
> Moose
>
>
> Lama-Jim L'Hommedieu wrote:
>
> >What's this puppy worth without a tripod collar, in OM mount? ebuy
"completed" auctions show only one example in manual focus for
> >Nikon F mount & it was $150 even but it included a mount.
> >
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|