Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Olympus E-1 review

Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus E-1 review
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 19:23:52 -0400
For those considering the digital Rebel, v the E-1, and for whatever
it's worth -
Sturdiness of build, weather proofing, and many of the other features
that make the E-1 far more expensive than the digital Rebel are far, far
more important in a digital camera than they are in a film camera.

Ultimately, you get what you pay for. If all you care about is sensor
size and number of megapixles, fine. If you want a serious camera, built
to take serious use and hold up to that use, that's an entirely
different matter; and it's a more expensive matter. ;-)

B. D.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Winsor Crosby
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 12:02 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus E-1 review



On Thursday, October 16, 2003, at 01:47 PM, Moose wrote:

> Yes, a disturbing pair of reviews, with the E-1 and The D300/Digital
> Rebel back to back. Disturbing at least if one is rooting/hoping for 
> Oly.
>
> Moose
>

Except for the price I would not worry too much about the E-1 compared 
with a D300. It will sell to a different crowd. There is a very hot 
Olympus DSLR forum at dpreview.com.

  With the lag time that Pop Photo has between review and publication, 
it was a pre-production camera. I have been following it on the web 
quite a bit and the latest pictures with the E-1 are noticeably 
improved over the ones just a month or so ago. That Kodak sensor is 
looking very nice.  When you consider the different format(it is 
slightly less wide), the pixel loss compared to the competition is just 
a small bit on the ends of the frame.

 From what I have read the reason for the special mount on the Canon is 
not that it is for digitally designed lenses. The optional lens is 
supposed to be a remounting of an old APS camera zoom design, not the 
long retrofocus design Olympus says is needed for best digital 
performance. Because it was designed for a thinner camera, it sticks 
into the mirror box. The mirror movement had to be redesigned to avoid 
hitting the back of the lens. The reason for the different mount is to 
prevent its being mounted on another model Canon and wrecking the 
mirror.

Canon will still nail down first because it is cheap, but there are 
lots of sales to be made for everyone else. There is a rumor flying 
that Konica-Minolta is readying a DSLR too.


Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz