Re: [OM] E-1 lenses resolution vs conventional lenses

Subject: Re: [OM] E-1 lenses resolution vs conventional lenses
From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 11:28:56 -0500
Well, yeah, but it means I would be trading my 50/2 for a 180/2, 
and assuming the 180's not junk, I'll do that in a heartbeat.  I 
can always find another 50/2.  I bet jonequinn, or whatever his 
name is, has one for less than $1K.  :-)

Am I missing something?


Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers.

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:  Wed, 5 Nov 2003 08:24:59 -0800 

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Walt Wayman 
>>And, C.H., with all them f/2 lenses, where's yer 50/2 and 
>>180/2?  I've got one, but not the other, and I'll trade the one 
>>I've got for the one I don't.  :-)
>Am I missing something here Walt?  Doesn't this still leave you 
>with 'one and not the other'??
>My 'new math' may be failing me here.


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>