TAKO. INTERNET SEIT 1996.
Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Playing with an E-1

Subject: Re: [OM] Playing with an E-1
From: Skip Williams <om2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 14:19:16 -0500
The noise issue is secondary, IMO.  If I buy, it will be because of handling, 
lens quailty, and image quality.  The higher-than-the-competition-from-C*NON 
noise can be compensated for by software processing.  We've all dealt with 
grain in the past, it's no different than noise.  I don't shoot at high ISO's 
much, so the issue may be minor.  The C*anon CMOS chips definitely have lower 
noise at the higher ISO's, which is a big plug for them.

OTOH, I am probably just talking myself into something. :-)

Skip


>
>Subject: Re: [OM] Playing with an E-1
>   From: =?windows-1250?Q?Doroth=E9e_Rapp?= <om@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>   Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 14:42:40 +0100
>     To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>Skip Williams schrieb:
>
>> Something doesn't sound right with the experiences that the two of
>> you mention.  I have also not heard of any comments on dpreview.com
>> about slow write times or slow autofocusing speeds or slow reviews;
>
>Maybe just some complicated or special setting. When we had a few E1 to 
>play with, everybody mentioned very quick AF, fast writing to memory  etc.
>This camera obviously requires some knowledge about the settings. It's 
>just no P&S ;)
>But then there are still noise levels reported at dpreview that have 
>been improved since (or am I mistaken there?).
>Olympus obviously either misjudged the importance of a spot-on and clear 
>  handling info or they just don't care.
>
>just my 2 ?cents
>:Doro
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>