Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #4447

Subject: Re: [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #4447
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:23:22 -0800
Stephen Scharf wrote:

They aren't comparable only in the sense of the bulld quality. I would wager the image quality of the 300D every bit as good as , and likely, superior to that of the E-1. Depends on what you're looking for in a camera.

Damn, I just put that in so B.D. wouldn't jump on me. Then I get hit from the other side. :-)

I think the differences, ignoring most image quality differences (which I'm not in a position to argue) go beyond build quality. The E-1 also has true spot metering, which the 300D doesn't, apparently better overall metering accuracy and a unique and apparently effective automatic sensor cleaner. Then the 300D has a quite usable built-in flash, superior low light focusing and an already established and future assured upgrade path in digital bodies. The upshot is what I said, they just aren't comparable. Which one is 'better' will depend on the individual user.

For me, for example, the flash is a big deal. I would like to use fill flash more with my OMs, but hate the hassle of carrying the flash and the awkwardness on the camera, and the calculations sometimes needed. A pop-up flash with controllable balance is pretty tempting. But then.................

Moose



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz